- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Aero Crisp Spin vs AF200
Taurus Aero Crisp Spin vs TurboTronic AF200
What Aero Crisp Spin does better (3) and where AF200 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Power & capacity6.8
6.2Versatility4.1
7.3Controls & convenience3.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aero Crisp SpinAF200
| Aero Crisp Spin | AF200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 312 mm | 320 mm | −8 mm |
| Width | 298 mm | 383 mm | −85 mm |
| Depth | 390 mm | 316 mm | +74 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aero Crisp Spin better than AF200?
- BakingYes · AF200: No
- Viewing windowYes · AF200: No
- Non-stick coatingYes · AF200: No
Why is AF200 better than Aero Crisp Spin?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 7.2 l+20%
- Power1,550 W vs 1,750 W+13%
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,550 W | 1,750 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6 l | 7.2 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 8 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry, Bake | Cook, Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | Yes | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LED |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | — | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Metal |
| Cord storage | — | Yes |
| Width | 298 mm | 383 mm |
| Height | 312 mm | 320 mm |
| Depth | 390 mm | 316 mm |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
