- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- NA322 vs AF200
Philips NA322 vs TurboTronic AF200
What NA322 does better (5) and where AF200 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
NA322AF200
| NA322 | AF200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 294 mm | 320 mm | −26 mm |
| Width | 286 mm | 383 mm | −97 mm |
| Depth | 294 mm | 316 mm | −22 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is NA322 better than AF200?
- BakingYes · AF200: No
- Grill functionYes · AF200: No
- Keep warmYes · AF200: No
- Viewing windowYes · AF200: No
- DisplayTouchscreen vs LED
Why is AF200 better than NA322?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l vs 7.2 l+71%
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | — | 1,750 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 4.2 l | 7.2 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 8 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Keep warm | Cook, Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | No |
| Grill function | Yes | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | Yes | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | Yes | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | LED |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | — | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Metal |
| Cord storage | Yes | Yes |
| Width | 286 mm | 383 mm |
| Height | 294 mm | 320 mm |
| Depth | 294 mm | 316 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Series | Philips Series 3000 | — |
