2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 16538 vs AF200

GOURMETmaxx 16538 vs TurboTronic AF200

What 16538 does better (4) and where AF200 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

GOURMETmaxx 16538
GOURMETmaxx · 202516538
6.1Score
4 advantages≈ US$30
vs
TurboTronic AF200
TurboTronic · 2025AF200
6.1Score
3 advantages
Higher score
3.4Power & capacity6.8
7.7Versatility4.1
8.5Controls & convenience3.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

16538AF200
330 × 340330383 × 320316
16538AF200Difference
Height340 mm320 mm+20 mm
Width330 mm383 mm−53 mm
Depth330 mm316 mm+14 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 16538 better than AF200?

  1. BakingYes · AF200: No
  2. Grill functionYes · AF200: No
  3. DisplayTouchscreen vs LED
  4. Non-stick coatingYes · AF200: No

Why is AF200 better than 16538?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.5 l vs 7.2 l+60%
  2. Power1,500 W vs 1,750 W+17%
  3. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

GOURMETmaxx 16538GOURMETmaxx 16538≈ US$306.1
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.5 l7.2 l
Automatic programmes—8
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, ReheatCook, Air fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticMetal
Cord storage—Yes
Width330 mm383 mm
Height340 mm320 mm
Depth330 mm316 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare