- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- R-2849 vs AF200
Rohnson R-2849 vs TurboTronic AF200
What R-2849 does better (1) and where AF200 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is R-2849 better than AF200?
- DisplayLCD vs LED
Why is AF200 better than R-2849?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l vs 7.2 l+11%
- Power1,600 W vs 1,750 W+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,600 W | 1,750 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6.5 l | 7.2 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | 8 |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Cook, Air fry |
| Steaming | — | No |
| Baking | — | No |
| Grill function | — | No |
| Dehydrating | — | No |
| Keep warm | — | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | LED |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | — | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Metal |
| Cord storage | — | Yes |
| Width | — | 383 mm |
| Height | — | 320 mm |
| Depth | — | 316 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
