- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- NA350 vs Condor Inox
Philips NA350 vs Ufesa Condor Inox
What NA350 does better (2) and where Condor Inox wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Power & capacity4.6
5.3Versatility4.1
2.0Controls & convenience8.7
Why is NA350 better than Condor Inox?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l vs 4.5 l2×
- Power2,750 W vs 1,600 W+72%
Why is Condor Inox better than NA350?
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
- TimerNo · NA350: Yes
- Non-stick coatingNo · NA350: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,750 W | 1,600 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 9 l | 4.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 10 |
| Max. temperature | 180 °C | 180 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry | Air fry, Reheat |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Sync / match finish | Yes | — |
| Viewing window | No | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | Touchscreen |
| Timer | No | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Silver |
