2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. RACH'S Sichtfenster Fassungsvermögen vs NA350

KOCHWERK RACH'S Sichtfenster Fassungsvermögen vs Philips NA350

What RACH'S Sichtfenster Fassungsvermögen does better (5) and where NA350 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

KOCHWERK RACH'S Sichtfenster Fassungsvermögen
6.0Score
5 advantages
vs
Philips NA350
Philips · 2024NA350
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$120
Higher score
3.9Power & capacity8.6
8.9Versatility5.3
4.9Controls & convenience2.0

Why is RACH'S Sichtfenster Fassungsvermögen better than NA350?

  1. BakingYes · NA350: No
  2. Grill functionYes · NA350: No
  3. Keep warmYes · NA350: No
  4. Viewing windowYes · NA350: No
  5. TimerYes · NA350: No

Why is NA350 better than RACH'S Sichtfenster Fassungsvermögen?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 2,750 W+96%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7.5 l vs 9 l+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA350Philips NA350≈ US$1206.3
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W2,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7.5 l9 l
Max. temperature180 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warmCook, Air fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Sync / match finish—Yes
Viewing windowYesNo
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerYesNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingMetalPlastic
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare