2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20 vs NA350

Moulinex Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20 vs Philips NA350

What Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20 does better (2) and where NA350 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Moulinex Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20
6.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$110
vs
Philips NA350
Philips · 2024NA350
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$120
Higher score
7.9Power & capacity8.6
4.1Versatility5.3
2.7Controls & convenience2.0

Why is Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20 better than NA350?

  1. TimerYes · NA350: No
  2. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is NA350 better than Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20?

  1. Power2,450 W vs 2,750 W+12%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.3 l vs 9 l+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA350Philips NA350≈ US$1206.3
Power & capacity
Power2,450 W2,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8.3 l9 l
Automatic programmes7—
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Food capacity0.7 kg—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Sync / match finish—Yes
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerYesNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingMetalPlastic
Width420 mm—
Height306 mm—
Depth400 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare