2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA220 vs TMPFR200

Philips NA220 vs T&M TMPFR200

What NA220 does better (4) and where TMPFR200 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA220
Philips · 2024NA220
7.0Score
4 advantages≈ US$85
vs
T&M TMPFR200
T&M · 2024TMPFR200
7.3Score
4 advantages≈ US$90
Higher score
4.0Power & capacity6.8
8.9Versatility5.2
8.4Controls & convenience7.8

Why is NA220 better than TMPFR200?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · TMPFR200: No
  2. BakingYes · TMPFR200: No
  3. Grill functionYes · TMPFR200: No
  4. Keep warmYes · TMPFR200: No

Why is TMPFR200 better than NA220?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l vs 8 l+90%
  2. Power1,500 W vs 1,700 W+13%
  3. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
  4. Non-stick coatingNo · NA220: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA220Philips NA220≈ US$857.0
T&M TMPFR200T&M TMPFR200≈ US$907.3
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l8 l
Automatic programmes—8
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature—60 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warmAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width273 mm—
Height293 mm—
Depth368 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare