2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA330 vs TMPFR200

Philips NA330 vs T&M TMPFR200

What NA330 does better (4) and where TMPFR200 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA330
Philips · 2024NA330
7.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
vs
T&M TMPFR200
T&M · 2024TMPFR200
7.3Score
4 advantages≈ US$90
5.2Power & capacity6.8
8.9Versatility5.2
6.7Controls & convenience7.8

Why is NA330 better than TMPFR200?

  1. BakingYes · TMPFR200: No
  2. Grill functionYes · TMPFR200: No
  3. DehydratingYes · TMPFR200: No
  4. Viewing windowYes · TMPFR200: No

Why is TMPFR200 better than NA330?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l vs 8 l+29%
  2. DisplayLCD vs Touchscreen
  3. Non-stick coatingNo · NA330: Yes
  4. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA330Philips NA330≈ US$857.4
T&M TMPFR200T&M TMPFR200≈ US$907.3
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l8 l
Automatic programmes—8
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Min. temperature—60 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDTouchscreen
Timer—Yes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingMetalPlastic
Width324 mm—
Height303 mm—
Depth436 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare