2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Combo TK3G vs NA220

Klarstein Combo TK3G vs Philips NA220

What Combo TK3G does better (3) and where NA220 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Klarstein Combo TK3G
Klarstein · 2024Combo TK3G
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ US$100
vs
Philips NA220
Philips · 2024NA220
7.0Score
3 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
3.1Power & capacity4.0
9.4Versatility8.9
8.7Controls & convenience8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Combo TK3GNA220
453 × 262351273 × 293368
Combo TK3GNA220Difference
Height262 mm293 mm−31 mm
Width453 mm273 mm+180 mm
Depth351 mm368 mm−17 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Combo TK3G better than NA220?

  1. DehydratingYes · NA220: No
  2. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)
  3. Non-stick coatingYes · NA220: No

Why is NA220 better than Combo TK3G?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l vs 4.2 l+68%
  2. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · Combo TK3G: Yes
  3. Keep warmNo · Combo TK3G: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA220Philips NA220≈ US$857.0
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l4.2 l
Automatic programmes5—
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature30 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, DehydrateCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width453 mm273 mm
Height262 mm293 mm
Depth351 mm368 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare