- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- PHAF vs AF200
Philco PHAF vs TurboTronic AF200
What PHAF does better (2) and where AF200 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is PHAF better than AF200?
- Power2,100 W vs 1,750 W+20%
- DisplayLCD vs LED
Why is AF200 better than PHAF?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.5 l vs 7.2 l+31%
- Automatic programmes6 vs 8+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,100 W | 1,750 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5.5 l | 7.2 l |
| Automatic programmes | 6 | 8 |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Cook, Air fry |
| Steaming | — | No |
| Baking | — | No |
| Grill function | — | No |
| Dehydrating | — | No |
| Keep warm | — | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | LED |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | — | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Metal |
| Cord storage | — | Yes |
| Width | — | 383 mm |
| Height | — | 320 mm |
| Depth | — | 316 mm |
| Colours | White | Black |
