3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Combo TK3G vs EY145A Easy Fry Compact

Klarstein Combo TK3G vs Tefal EY145A Easy Fry Compact

What Combo TK3G does better (5) and where EY145A Easy Fry Compact wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Klarstein Combo TK3G
Klarstein · 2024Combo TK3G
6.8Score
5 advantages≈ US$90
Higher score
vs
Tefal EY145A Easy Fry Compact
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$80
3.1Power & capacity2.1
9.3Versatility4.1
8.7Controls & convenience8.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Combo TK3GEY145A Easy Fry Compact
453 × 262351275 × 324375
Combo TK3GEY145A Easy Fry CompactDifference
Height262 mm324 mm−62 mm
Width453 mm275 mm+178 mm
Depth351 mm375 mm−24 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Combo TK3G better than EY145A Easy Fry Compact?

  1. Power1,500 W vs 1,300 W+15%
  2. BakingYes · EY145A Easy Fry Compact: No
  3. Grill functionYes · EY145A Easy Fry Compact: No
  4. DehydratingYes · EY145A Easy Fry Compact: No
  5. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is EY145A Easy Fry Compact better than Combo TK3G?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l vs 3 l+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,300 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.5 l3 l
Automatic programmes5—
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Min. temperature30 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, DehydrateCook, Air fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width453 mm275 mm
Height262 mm324 mm
Depth351 mm375 mm
Colours—White
Series—Tefal Easy Fry
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare