2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Air Pro 42582 vs EY145A Easy Fry Compact

Gastroback Air Pro 42582 vs Tefal EY145A Easy Fry Compact

What Air Pro 42582 does better (4) and where EY145A Easy Fry Compact wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Gastroback Air Pro 42582
Gastroback · 2024Air Pro 42582
4.2Score
4 advantages≈ US$80
Higher score
vs
Tefal EY145A Easy Fry Compact
4.0Score
2 advantages≈ US$80
2.2Power & capacity2.1
8.9Versatility4.1
3.0Controls & convenience8.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Air Pro 42582EY145A Easy Fry Compact
395 × 374357275 × 324375
Air Pro 42582EY145A Easy Fry CompactDifference
Height374 mm324 mm+50 mm
Width395 mm275 mm+120 mm
Depth357 mm375 mm−18 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Air Pro 42582 better than EY145A Easy Fry Compact?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.7 l vs 3 l+23%
  2. BakingYes · EY145A Easy Fry Compact: No
  3. Grill functionYes · EY145A Easy Fry Compact: No
  4. DehydratingYes · EY145A Easy Fry Compact: No

Why is EY145A Easy Fry Compact better than Air Pro 42582?

  1. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
  2. Non-stick coatingNo · Air Pro 42582: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,300 W1,300 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.7 l3 l
Max. temperature180 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatCook, Air fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width395 mm275 mm
Height374 mm324 mm
Depth357 mm375 mm
ColoursBlackWhite
Series—Tefal Easy Fry
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare