- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Airmed 8 vs NA350
KitchenCook Airmed 8 vs Philips NA350
What Airmed 8 does better (5) and where NA350 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Airmed 8 better than NA350?
- Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
- Power3,300 W vs 2,750 W+20%
- DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)
- TimerYes · NA350: No
- Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%
Why is NA350 better than Airmed 8?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l vs 9 l+12%
- Sync / match finishNo · Airmed 8: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 3,300 W | 2,750 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 8 l | 9 l |
| Automatic programmes | 10 | — |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 180 °C |
| Min. temperature | 60 °C | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Cook, Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 2 | 1 |
| Sync / match finish | No | Yes |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
