2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Air Pro 42583 vs Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20

Gastroback Air Pro 42583 vs Moulinex Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20

What Air Pro 42583 does better (4) and where Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Gastroback Air Pro 42583
Gastroback · 2024Air Pro 42583
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$110
Higher score
vs
Moulinex Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20
6.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$110
7.2Power & capacity7.9
8.9Versatility4.1
7.3Controls & convenience2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Air Pro 42583Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20
290 × 298343420 × 306400
Air Pro 42583Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20Difference
Height298 mm306 mm−8 mm
Width290 mm420 mm−130 mm
Depth343 mm400 mm−57 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Air Pro 42583 better than Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20: No
  2. BakingYes · Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20: No
  3. Grill functionYes · Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20: No
  4. DehydratingYes · Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20: No

Why is Easy Fry Dual Essential EZ901N20 better than Air Pro 42583?

  1. Power1,800 W vs 2,450 W+36%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l vs 8.3 l+28%
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,800 W2,450 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l8.3 l
Automatic programmes—7
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Food capacity—0.7 kg
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingStainless steelMetal
Width290 mm420 mm
Height298 mm306 mm
Depth343 mm400 mm
ColoursBlack, SilverBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare