3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Air Pro 42583 vs NA351

Gastroback Air Pro 42583 vs Philips NA351

What Air Pro 42583 does better (3) and where NA351 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Gastroback Air Pro 42583
Gastroback · 2024Air Pro 42583
8.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$110
Higher score
vs
Philips NA351
Philips · 2024NA351
8.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$120
7.2Power & capacity8.5
8.9Versatility6.1
7.4Controls & convenience8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Air Pro 42583NA351
290 × 298343315 × 444314
Air Pro 42583NA351Difference
Height298 mm444 mm−146 mm
Width290 mm315 mm−25 mm
Depth343 mm314 mm+29 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Air Pro 42583 better than NA351?

  1. Grill functionYes · NA351: No
  2. DehydratingYes · NA351: No
  3. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is NA351 better than Air Pro 42583?

  1. Power1,800 W vs 2,750 W+53%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l vs 9 l+38%
  3. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA351Philips NA351≈ US$1208.6
Power & capacity
Power1,800 W2,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l9 l
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesYes
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingStainless steelPlastic
Width290 mm315 mm
Height298 mm444 mm
Depth343 mm314 mm
ColoursBlack, SilverBlack
Series—Philips Series 3000
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare