2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Air Pro 42582 vs NA220

Gastroback Air Pro 42582 vs Philips NA220

What Air Pro 42582 does better (1) and where NA220 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Gastroback Air Pro 42582
Gastroback · 2024Air Pro 42582
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ US$80
vs
Philips NA220
Philips · 2024NA220
7.0Score
5 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
2.2Power & capacity4.0
8.9Versatility8.9
3.0Controls & convenience8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Air Pro 42582NA220
395 × 374357273 × 293368
Air Pro 42582NA220Difference
Height374 mm293 mm+81 mm
Width395 mm273 mm+122 mm
Depth357 mm368 mm−11 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Air Pro 42582 better than NA220?

  1. DehydratingYes · NA220: No

Why is NA220 better than Air Pro 42582?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · Air Pro 42582: Yes
  2. Power1,300 W vs 1,500 W+15%
  3. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.7 l vs 4.2 l+14%
  4. Keep warmNo · Air Pro 42582: Yes
  5. Max. temperature180 °C vs 200 °C+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA220Philips NA220≈ US$857.0
Power & capacity
Power1,300 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.7 l4.2 l
Max. temperature180 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width395 mm273 mm
Height374 mm293 mm
Depth357 mm368 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare