2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. DMAV0069 vs AF200

DAM Electronics DMAV0069 vs TurboTronic AF200

What DMAV0069 does better (3) and where AF200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

DAM Electronics DMAV0069
DAM Electronics · 2025DMAV0069
6.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$130
Higher score
vs
TurboTronic AF200
TurboTronic · 2025AF200
6.1Score
1 advantage
5.2Power & capacity6.8
4.1Versatility4.1
7.8Controls & convenience3.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

DMAV0069AF200
260 × 320280383 × 320316
DMAV0069AF200Difference
Height320 mm320 mm=
Width260 mm383 mm−123 mm
Depth280 mm316 mm−36 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is DMAV0069 better than AF200?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l vs 7.2 l+11%
  2. DisplayTouchscreen vs LED
  3. Non-stick coatingYes · AF200: No

Why is AF200 better than DMAV0069?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 1,750 W+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l7.2 l
Automatic programmes88
Max. temperature—200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, RoastCook, Air fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticMetal
Cord storage—Yes
Width260 mm383 mm
Height320 mm320 mm
Depth280 mm316 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare