2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Dot 835157 vs AF200

Aigostar Dot 835157 vs TurboTronic AF200

What Dot 835157 does better (3) and where AF200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Aigostar Dot 835157
Aigostar · 2025Dot 835157
6.1Score
3 advantages≈ US$60
vs
TurboTronic AF200
TurboTronic · 2025AF200
6.1Score
1 advantage
5.3Power & capacity6.8
2.1Versatility4.1
7.8Controls & convenience3.7

Why is Dot 835157 better than AF200?

  1. Power2,000 W vs 1,750 W+14%
  2. DisplayTouchscreen vs LED
  3. Non-stick coatingYes · AF200: No

Why is AF200 better than Dot 835157?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l vs 7.2 l3.6×
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power2,000 W1,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l7.2 l
Automatic programmes88
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry
Steaming—No
Baking—No
Grill function—No
Dehydrating—No
Keep warm—No
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticMetal
Cord storage—Yes
Width—383 mm
Height—320 mm
Depth—316 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare