3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 12 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. HF 900 vs T17215

Steba HF 900 vs Tower T17215

What HF 900 does better (1) and where T17215 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Steba HF 900
Steba · 2017HF 900
6.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$140
vs
Tower T17215
TowerT17215
9.2Score
5 advantages≈ US$150
Higher score
3.3Power & capacity7.9
6.9Versatility6.5
8.9Controls & convenience9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

HF 900T17215
330 × 250330444 × 335313
HF 900T17215Difference
Height250 mm335 mm−85 mm
Width330 mm444 mm−114 mm
Depth330 mm313 mm+17 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is HF 900 better than T17215?

  1. BakingYes · T17215: No

Why is T17215 better than HF 900?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l vs 8 l4×
  2. Power1,500 W vs 1,700 W+13%
  3. Keep warmNo · HF 900: Yes
  4. Viewing windowNo · HF 900: Yes
  5. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

Steba HF 900Steba HF 900≈ US$1406.0
Tower T17215Tower T17215≈ US$1509.2
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l8 l
Automatic programmes—10
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Bake, Grill—
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoYes
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer30 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYes—
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlastic—
Width330 mm444 mm
Height250 mm335 mm
Depth330 mm313 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare