3,098 models · 470 brandsupdated 29 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AeroVital Cube Chef vs T17215

Klarstein AeroVital Cube Chef vs Tower T17215

What AeroVital Cube Chef does better (5) and where T17215 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Klarstein AeroVital Cube Chef
Klarstein · 2020AeroVital Cube Chef
9.4Score
5 advantages≈ US$150
Higher score
vs
Tower T17215
TowerT17215
9.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$150
9.6Power & capacity7.9
8.4Versatility6.5
8.3Controls & convenience9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

AeroVital Cube ChefT17215
330 × 385375444 × 335313
AeroVital Cube ChefT17215Difference
Height385 mm335 mm+50 mm
Width330 mm444 mm−114 mm
Depth375 mm313 mm+62 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AeroVital Cube Chef better than T17215?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)14 l vs 8 l+75%
  2. Automatic programmes16 vs 10+60%
  3. BakingYes · T17215: No
  4. Max. temperature220 °C vs 200 °C+10%
  5. Min. temperature50 °C vs 80 °C+60%

Why is T17215 better than AeroVital Cube Chef?

  1. Keep warmNo · AeroVital Cube Chef: Yes
  2. Non-stick coatingNo · AeroVital Cube Chef: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Tower T17215Tower T17215≈ US$1509.2
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)14 l8 l
Automatic programmes1610
Max. temperature220 °C200 °C
Min. temperature50 °C80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat—
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesYes
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
Timer—Yes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingStainless steel—
Width330 mm444 mm
Height385 mm335 mm
Depth375 mm313 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare