3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 348113 vs AF9M

StarQ 348113 vs TurboTronic AF9M

What 348113 does better (3) and where AF9M wins (2) — every spec side by side.

StarQ 348113
StarQ · 2022348113
4.4Score
3 advantages≈ US$35
Higher score
vs
TurboTronic AF9M
TurboTronic · 2022AF9M
3.8Score
2 advantages
2.7Power & capacity2.1
2.5Versatility6.1
7.9Controls & convenience3.6

Why is 348113 better than AF9M?

  1. DisplayTouchscreen vs LED
  2. Non-stick coatingYes · AF9M: No
  3. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is AF9M better than 348113?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.6 l vs 3.5 l+35%
  2. BakingNo · 348113: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

StarQ 348113StarQ 348113≈ US$354.4
Power & capacity
Power1,200 W1,200 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2.6 l3.5 l
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width314 mm—
Height265 mm—
Depth302 mm—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare