3,098 models · 470 brandsupdated 29 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 3501 vs 348113

ECG AF 3501 vs StarQ 348113

What AF 3501 does better (3) and where 348113 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

ECG AF 3501
ECG · 2022AF 3501
4.5Score
3 advantages≈ US$40
Higher score
vs
StarQ 348113
StarQ · 2022348113
4.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$35
2.3Power & capacity2.7
7.7Versatility2.5
6.1Controls & convenience7.9

Why is AF 3501 better than 348113?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 1,200 W+17%
  2. BakingYes · 348113: No
  3. Grill functionYes · 348113: No

Why is 348113 better than AF 3501?

  1. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
  2. Max. temperature180 °C vs 200 °C+11%
Specifications

Side by side

ECG AF 3501ECG AF 3501≈ US$404.5
StarQ 348113StarQ 348113≈ US$354.4
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,200 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—2.6 l
Max. temperature180 °C200 °C
Min. temperature—80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Bake, Roast, GrillAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width—314 mm
Height—265 mm
Depth—302 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare