2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001 vs Thunder

Princess Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001 vs Ufesa Thunder

What Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001 does better (5) and where Thunder wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Princess Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001
9.4Score
5 advantages≈ US$80
Higher score
vs
Ufesa Thunder
Ufesa · 2024Thunder
7.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$75
8.1Power & capacity7.3
8.4Versatility4.1
9.6Controls & convenience8.7

Why is Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001 better than Thunder?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · Thunder: No
  2. Power1,800 W vs 1,700 W+6%
  3. BakingYes · Thunder: No
  4. Grill functionYes · Thunder: No
  5. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is Thunder better than Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l vs 9 l+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Ufesa ThunderUfesa Thunder≈ US$757.8
Power & capacity
Power1,800 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l9 l
Automatic programmes—11
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Min. temperature50 °C—
Food capacity2 kg—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Bake, GrillAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width400 mm—
Height322 mm—
Depth305 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare