2,326 models · 427 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 3185 AirFry 6.0 vs Thunder

Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0 vs Ufesa Thunder

What 3185 AirFry 6.0 does better (3) and where Thunder wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0
Caso · 20243185 AirFry 6.0
7.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$70
vs
Ufesa Thunder
Ufesa · 2024Thunder
7.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$75
6.0Power & capacity7.4
7.7Versatility4.1
7.8Controls & convenience8.7

Why is 3185 AirFry 6.0 better than Thunder?

  1. BakingYes · Thunder: No
  2. DehydratingYes · Thunder: No
  3. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is Thunder better than 3185 AirFry 6.0?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 9 l+50%
  2. Non-stick coatingNo · 3185 AirFry 6.0: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Ufesa ThunderUfesa Thunder≈ US$757.8
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l9 l
Automatic programmes—11
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, DehydrateAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYes—
Interior lightYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width280 mm—
Height400 mm—
Depth280 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare