- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- NA552 vs AirCook TrioZone Q636
Philips NA552 vs TESLA AirCook TrioZone Q636
What NA552 does better (3) and where AirCook TrioZone Q636 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Power & capacity7.3
8.5Versatility8.6
7.5Controls & convenience7.0
Why is NA552 better than AirCook TrioZone Q636?
- DehydratingYes · AirCook TrioZone Q636: No
- DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD
- Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%
Why is AirCook TrioZone Q636 better than NA552?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l vs 12 l+33%
- Grill functionNo · NA552: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,750 W | 2,800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 9 l | 12 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 3 |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 190 °C |
| Min. temperature | 40 °C | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry, Bake, Roast, Dehydrate | Cook, Sauté, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Pizza |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | Yes |
| Grill function | No | Yes |
| Dehydrating | Yes | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | — |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Interior light | — | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | LCD |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Ceramic |
| Cord storage | Yes | — |
| Height | 382 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
