- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- AirCook TrioZone Q636 vs Swan Elegance
TESLA AirCook TrioZone Q636 vs Ufesa Swan Elegance
What AirCook TrioZone Q636 does better (2) and where Swan Elegance wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Power & capacity8.8
8.6Versatility2.1
7.0Controls & convenience8.9
Why is AirCook TrioZone Q636 better than Swan Elegance?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)12 l vs 7.5 l+60%
- Power2,800 W vs 2,200 W+27%
Why is Swan Elegance better than AirCook TrioZone Q636?
- Automatic programmes3 vs 103.3×
- Viewing windowNo · AirCook TrioZone Q636: Yes
- DisplayLCD vs Touchscreen
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,800 W | 2,200 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 12 l | 7.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | 3 | 10 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | — | 80 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Sauté, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Pizza | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | — |
| Baking | Yes | — |
| Grill function | Yes | — |
| Dehydrating | No | — |
| Keep warm | No | — |
| Baskets / cooking zones | — | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | Yes |
| Interior light | Yes | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | Touchscreen |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | — | 60 min |
| App control | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Ceramic | Plastic |
| Width | — | 338 mm |
| Height | — | 392 mm |
| Depth | — | 286 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
