- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- NA332 vs Aero Crisp Spin
Philips NA332 vs Taurus Aero Crisp Spin
What NA332 does better (4) and where Aero Crisp Spin wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Power & capacity4.5
6.1Versatility6.1
3.4Controls & convenience7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
NA332Aero Crisp Spin
| NA332 | Aero Crisp Spin | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 303 mm | 312 mm | −9 mm |
| Width | 324 mm | 298 mm | +26 mm |
| Depth | 436 mm | 390 mm | +46 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is NA332 better than Aero Crisp Spin?
- Power1,700 W vs 1,550 W+10%
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l vs 6 l+3%
- Grill functionYes · Aero Crisp Spin: No
- DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)
Why is Aero Crisp Spin better than NA332?
- BakingNo · NA332: Yes
- Viewing windowNo · NA332: Yes
- Non-stick coatingNo · NA332: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,700 W | 1,550 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6.2 l | 6 l |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry, Grill | Air fry, Bake |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | Yes |
| Grill function | Yes | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | Yes |
| Housing | Metal | Plastic |
| Width | 324 mm | 298 mm |
| Height | 303 mm | 312 mm |
| Depth | 436 mm | 390 mm |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
