2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA330 vs NA332

Philips NA330 vs Philips NA332

What NA330 does better (3) and where NA332 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA330
Philips · 2024NA330
7.4Score
3 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
vs
Philips NA332
Philips · 2025NA332
5.6Score
0 advantages≈ US$150
5.2Power & capacity5.2
8.9Versatility6.1
6.7Controls & convenience3.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

NA330NA332
324 × 303436324 × 303436
NA330NA332Difference
Height303 mm303 mm=
Width324 mm324 mm=
Depth436 mm436 mm=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NA330 better than NA332?

  1. BakingYes · NA332: No
  2. DehydratingYes · NA332: No
  3. Viewing windowYes · NA332: No

Why is NA332 better than NA330?

NA332 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA330Philips NA330≈ US$857.4
Philips NA332Philips NA332≈ US$1505.6
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l6.2 l
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatAir fry, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDLCD
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingMetalMetal
Width324 mm324 mm
Height303 mm303 mm
Depth436 mm436 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare