2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 24 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA320 vs Praga P390

Philips NA320 vs Silver Praga P390

What NA320 does better (0) and where Praga P390 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA320
Philips · 2024NA320
5.3Score
0 advantages≈ US$95
Higher score
vs
Silver Praga P390
Silver · 2024Praga P390
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$90
3.0Power & capacity2.4
3.9Controls & convenience7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

NA320Praga P390
286 × 294266 × 318316
NA320Praga P390Difference
Height294 mm318 mm−24 mm
Width286 mm266 mm+20 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NA320 better than Praga P390?

NA320 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Praga P390 better than NA320?

  1. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA320Philips NA320≈ US$955.3
Silver Praga P390Silver Praga P390≈ US$904.0
Power & capacity
Power—1,200 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l—
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatAir fry
SteamingNo—
BakingYes—
Grill functionYes—
DehydratingYes—
Keep warmNo—
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesYes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
Timer—Yes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width286 mm266 mm
Height294 mm318 mm
Depth—316 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare