2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Crousty light vs NA320

Little Balance Crousty light vs Philips NA320

What Crousty light does better (1) and where NA320 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Little Balance Crousty light
Little Balance · 2024Crousty light
5.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$95
Higher score
vs
Philips NA320
Philips · 2024NA320
5.3Score
3 advantages≈ US$95
5.5Power & capacity3.0
4.1Versatility8.9

Why is Crousty light better than NA320?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 4.2 l+19%

Why is NA320 better than Crousty light?

  1. BakingNo · Crousty light: Yes
  2. Grill functionNo · Crousty light: Yes
  3. DehydratingNo · Crousty light: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA320Philips NA320≈ US$955.3
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W—
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l4.2 l
Automatic programmes12—
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—No
Non-stick coating—No
HousingMetalPlastic
Width—286 mm
Height—294 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare