3,098 models · 470 brandsupdated 29 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NF-CC500 vs NA320

Panasonic NF-CC500 vs Philips NA320

What NF-CC500 does better (3) and where NA320 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Panasonic NF-CC500
Panasonic · 2024NF-CC500
5.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$120
vs
Philips NA320
Philips · 2024NA320
5.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$95
Higher score
4.2Power & capacity3.0
4.1Versatility9.0
7.1Controls & convenience3.9

Why is NF-CC500 better than NA320?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 4.2 l+19%
  2. DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)
  3. Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%

Why is NA320 better than NF-CC500?

  1. BakingNo · NF-CC500: Yes
  2. Grill functionNo · NF-CC500: Yes
  3. DehydratingNo · NF-CC500: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Panasonic NF-CC500Panasonic NF-CC500≈ US$1205.2
Philips NA320Philips NA320≈ US$955.2
Power & capacity
Power1,450 W—
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l4.2 l
Max. temperature200 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesYes
Interior lightYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingGlassPlastic
Width—286 mm
Height—294 mm
ColoursGreyBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare