2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA220 vs FRH 1700

Philips NA220 vs Rommelsbacher FRH 1700

What NA220 does better (1) and where FRH 1700 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA220
Philips · 2024NA220
7.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$85
vs
Rommelsbacher FRH 1700
Rommelsbacher · 2024FRH 1700
8.9Score
4 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
4.0Power & capacity7.3
8.9Versatility8.9
8.4Controls & convenience8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

NA220FRH 1700
273 × 293368260 × 300470
NA220FRH 1700Difference
Height293 mm300 mm−7 mm
Width273 mm260 mm+13 mm
Depth368 mm470 mm−102 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NA220 better than FRH 1700?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · FRH 1700: No

Why is FRH 1700 better than NA220?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l vs 8 l+90%
  2. Power1,500 W vs 1,700 W+13%
  3. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
  4. Non-stick coatingNo · NA220: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA220Philips NA220≈ US$857.0
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l8 l
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warmAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—Yes
Interior light—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Width273 mm260 mm
Height293 mm300 mm
Depth368 mm470 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare