2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA210 vs WM-2203

Philips NA210 vs Wartmann WM-2203

What NA210 does better (2) and where WM-2203 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA210
Philips · 2025NA210
4.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$150
vs
Wartmann WM-2203
Wartmann · 2025WM-2203
5.3Score
3 advantages≈ US$160
Higher score
2.9Power & capacity5.0
2.5Versatility4.1
6.6Controls & convenience5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

NA210WM-2203
352 × 273257284 × 306345
NA210WM-2203Difference
Height273 mm306 mm−33 mm
Width352 mm284 mm+68 mm
Depth257 mm345 mm−88 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NA210 better than WM-2203?

  1. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)
  2. Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%

Why is WM-2203 better than NA210?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.2 l vs 5.7 l+78%
  2. Power1,300 W vs 1,700 W+31%
  3. Non-stick coatingNo · NA210: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA210Philips NA210≈ US$1504.3
Wartmann WM-2203Wartmann WM-2203≈ US$1605.3
Power & capacity
Power1,300 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.2 l5.7 l
Max. temperature200 °C190 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width352 mm284 mm
Height273 mm306 mm
Depth257 mm345 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
SeriesPhilips Series 2000—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare