2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA210 vs NA330

Philips NA210 vs Philips NA330

What NA210 does better (2) and where NA330 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA210
Philips · 2025NA210
4.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$150
vs
Philips NA330
Philips · 2024NA330
7.4Score
5 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
2.9Power & capacity5.2
2.5Versatility8.9
6.6Controls & convenience6.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

NA210NA330
352 × 273257324 × 303436
NA210NA330Difference
Height273 mm303 mm−30 mm
Width352 mm324 mm+28 mm
Depth257 mm436 mm−179 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NA210 better than NA330?

  1. DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD
  2. Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%

Why is NA330 better than NA210?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.2 l vs 6.2 l+94%
  2. Power1,300 W vs 1,700 W+31%
  3. BakingNo · NA210: Yes
  4. Grill functionNo · NA210: Yes
  5. DehydratingNo · NA210: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA210Philips NA210≈ US$1504.3
Philips NA330Philips NA330≈ US$857.4
Power & capacity
Power1,300 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.2 l6.2 l
Max. temperature200 °C190 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLCD
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticMetal
Width352 mm324 mm
Height273 mm303 mm
Depth257 mm436 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
SeriesPhilips Series 2000—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare