3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. PHAO vs Iridea

Philco PHAO vs Tognana Iridea

What PHAO does better (4) and where Iridea wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philco PHAO
Philco · 2025PHAO
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$290
Higher score
vs
Tognana Iridea
Tognana · 2024Iridea
8.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$310
9.8Power & capacity8.6
4.1Versatility7.2
4.3Controls & convenience4.3

Why is PHAO better than Iridea?

  1. Automatic programmes16 vs 82×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)15 l vs 11 l+36%
  3. Power2,250 W vs 2,000 W+12%
  4. Max. temperature220 °C vs 200 °C+10%

Why is Iridea better than PHAO?

  1. BakingNo · PHAO: Yes
  2. DehydratingNo · PHAO: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philco PHAOPhilco PHAO≈ US$2908.6
Tognana IrideaTognana Iridea≈ US$3108.2
Power & capacity
Power2,250 W2,000 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)15 l11 l
Automatic programmes168
Max. temperature220 °C200 °C
Min. temperature—80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, ReheatAir fry, Bake, Dehydrate
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Rotating basket / rotisserie—Yes
Interior lightYesYes
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDLCD
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingStainless steelStainless steel
Width—404 mm
Height—383 mm
Depth—339 mm
ColoursWhite, Silver—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare