2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. CAF-DC112 vs PHAO

Cosori CAF-DC112 vs Philco PHAO

What CAF-DC112 does better (4) and where PHAO wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Cosori CAF-DC112
Cosori · 2025CAF-DC112
8.9Score
4 advantages≈ US$280
Higher score
vs
Philco PHAO
Philco · 2025PHAO
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$290
5.3Power & capacity9.8
9.7Versatility4.1

Why is CAF-DC112 better than PHAO?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
  2. BakingYes · PHAO: No
  3. Grill functionYes · PHAO: No
  4. DehydratingYes · PHAO: No

Why is PHAO better than CAF-DC112?

  1. Automatic programmes3 vs 165.3×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)10.8 l vs 15 l+39%
  3. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LCD
  4. Max. temperature190 °C vs 220 °C+16%
Specifications

Side by side

Cosori CAF-DC112Cosori CAF-DC112≈ US$2808.9
Philco PHAOPhilco PHAO≈ US$2908.6
Power & capacity
Power—2,250 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)10.8 l15 l
Automatic programmes316
Max. temperature190 °C220 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatCook, Air fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones21
Viewing window—No
Interior light—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LCD
Timer—Yes
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—No
Non-stick coating—No
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Width300 mm—
Height405 mm—
Depth413 mm—
ColoursGrey, BlackWhite, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare