- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- PHAO vs FW6068
Philco PHAO vs Tefal FW6068
What PHAO does better (2) and where FW6068 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is PHAO better than FW6068?
- Power2,250 W vs 1,800 W+25%
- Max. temperature220 °C vs 190 °C+16%
Why is FW6068 better than PHAO?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)15 l vs 20 l+33%
- BakingNo · PHAO: Yes
- Grill functionNo · PHAO: Yes
- Keep warmNo · PHAO: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,250 W | 1,800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 15 l | 20 l |
| Automatic programmes | 16 | — |
| Max. temperature | 220 °C | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Reheat | Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warm |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | Yes |
| Grill function | No | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | Yes |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | LCD |
| Timer | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Colours | White, Silver | Black |
| Series | — | Tefal Easy Fry |
