- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- PHAO vs SHF 1800
Philco PHAO vs Silvercrest SHF 1800
What PHAO does better (5) and where SHF 1800 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is PHAO better than SHF 1800?
- Automatic programmes16 vs 35.3×
- Power2,250 W vs 1,800 W+25%
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)15 l vs 12 l+25%
- DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)
- Max. temperature220 °C vs 200 °C+10%
Why is SHF 1800 better than PHAO?
- BakingNo · PHAO: Yes
- DehydratingNo · PHAO: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,250 W | 1,800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 15 l | 12 l |
| Automatic programmes | 16 | 3 |
| Max. temperature | 220 °C | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Reheat | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Dehydrate, Reheat |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | Yes |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | Yes |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | — |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | — |
| Non-stick coating | No | — |
| Housing | Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Colours | White, Silver | — |
