- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- PHAO vs HD9876
Philco PHAO vs Philips HD9876
What PHAO does better (5) and where HD9876 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is PHAO better than HD9876?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)15 l vs 8.3 l+81%
- Power2,250 W vs 2,200 W+2%
- Max. temperature220 °C vs 180 °C+22%
- DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)
- TimerYes · HD9876: No
Why is HD9876 better than PHAO?
HD9876 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,250 W | 2,200 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 15 l | 8.3 l |
| Automatic programmes | 16 | — |
| Max. temperature | 220 °C | 180 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Reheat | Cook, Air fry, Reheat |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Width | — | 481 mm |
| Height | — | 429 mm |
| Depth | — | 381 mm |
| Colours | White, Silver | — |
