2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. PHAF 2108 vs 7426.4212

Philco PHAF 2108 vs Trisa 7426.4212

What PHAF 2108 does better (2) and where 7426.4212 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philco PHAF 2108
Philco · 2026PHAF 2108
5.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$110
vs
Trisa 7426.4212
Trisa · 20267426.4212
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$110
Higher score
4.2Power & capacity3.7
2.9Versatility7.7
7.0Controls & convenience5.2

Why is PHAF 2108 better than 7426.4212?

  1. Max. temperature230 °C vs 190 °C+21%
  2. Viewing windowYes · 7426.4212: No

Why is 7426.4212 better than PHAF 2108?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l vs 5 l+25%
  2. BakingNo · PHAF 2108: Yes
  3. Grill functionNo · PHAF 2108: Yes
  4. DisplayLCD vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

Philco PHAF 2108Philco PHAF 2108≈ US$1105.2
Trisa 7426.4212Trisa 7426.4212≈ US$1105.4
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l5 l
Automatic programmes7—
Max. temperature230 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCookCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones—1
Viewing windowYesNo
Interior lightYesYes
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDTouchscreen
TimerYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingGlassPlastic
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare