- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- PHAF 2108 vs AFG6
Philco PHAF 2108 vs TurboTronic AFG6
What PHAF 2108 does better (2) and where AFG6 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is PHAF 2108 better than AFG6?
- Max. temperature230 °C vs 190 °C+21%
- Viewing windowYes · AFG6: No
Why is AFG6 better than PHAF 2108?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l vs 6 l+50%
- Power1,500 W vs 1,600 W+7%
- DisplayLCD vs Touchscreen
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,500 W | 1,600 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 4 l | 6 l |
| Automatic programmes | 7 | 7 |
| Max. temperature | 230 °C | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook | Cook, Air fry, Reheat, Pizza |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | — | 1 |
| Viewing window | Yes | No |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | Touchscreen |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Glass | Glass |
