2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF200 vs FRH 1700

Ninja AF200 vs Rommelsbacher FRH 1700

What AF200 does better (2) and where FRH 1700 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Ninja AF200
Ninja · 2025AF200
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$140
vs
Rommelsbacher FRH 1700
Rommelsbacher · 2024FRH 1700
8.9Score
7 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
7.9Power & capacity7.3
8.3Versatility8.9
3.0Controls & convenience8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF200FRH 1700
380 × 315470260 × 300470
AF200FRH 1700Difference
Height315 mm300 mm+15 mm
Width380 mm260 mm+120 mm
Depth470 mm470 mm=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF200 better than FRH 1700?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
  2. Power2,400 W vs 1,700 W+41%

Why is FRH 1700 better than AF200?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7.6 l vs 8 l+5%
  2. BakingNo · AF200: Yes
  3. Grill functionNo · AF200: Yes
  4. Keep warmNo · AF200: Yes
  5. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
  6. TimerNo · AF200: Yes
  7. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Ninja AF200Ninja AF200≈ US$1407.6
Power & capacity
Power2,400 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7.6 l8 l
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Roast, ReheatAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones21
Sync / match finishYes—
Viewing window—Yes
Interior light—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LED
TimerNoYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Width380 mm260 mm
Height315 mm300 mm
Depth470 mm470 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare