2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF200 vs DZ400

Ninja AF200 vs Ninja DZ400

What AF200 does better (2) and where DZ400 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Ninja AF200
Ninja · 2025AF200
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$140
vs
Ninja DZ400
Ninja · 2025DZ400
9.5Score
7 advantages≈ US$160
Higher score
7.9Power & capacity9.8
8.3Versatility8.6
3.0Controls & convenience7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF200DZ400
380 × 315470415 × 325270
AF200DZ400Difference
Height315 mm325 mm−10 mm
Width380 mm415 mm−35 mm
Depth470 mm270 mm+200 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF200 better than DZ400?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
  2. Non-stick coatingYes · DZ400: No

Why is DZ400 better than AF200?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · AF200: Yes
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7.6 l vs 9.5 l+25%
  3. Power2,400 W vs 2,470 W+3%
  4. Max. temperature190 °C vs 240 °C+26%
  5. Grill functionNo · AF200: Yes
  6. Keep warmNo · AF200: Yes
  7. TimerNo · AF200: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Ninja AF200Ninja AF200≈ US$1407.6
Ninja DZ400Ninja DZ400≈ US$1609.5
Power & capacity
Power2,400 W2,470 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7.6 l9.5 l
Max. temperature190 °C240 °C
Min. temperature—40 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Roast, ReheatAir fry, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones21
Sync / match finishYesYes
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerNoYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width380 mm415 mm
Height315 mm325 mm
Depth470 mm270 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare