2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF160 MAX vs PHAO

Ninja AF160 MAX vs Philco PHAO

What AF160 MAX does better (4) and where PHAO wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Ninja AF160 MAX
Ninja · 2024AF160 MAX
7.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$390
vs
Philco PHAO
Philco · 2025PHAO
8.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$290
Higher score
4.5Power & capacity9.8
6.1Versatility4.1
9.6Controls & convenience4.3

Why is AF160 MAX better than PHAO?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · PHAO: No
  2. BakingYes · PHAO: No
  3. DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD
  4. Non-stick coatingYes · PHAO: No

Why is PHAO better than AF160 MAX?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.2 l vs 15 l2.9×
  2. Power1,750 W vs 2,250 W+29%
  3. Max. temperature180 °C vs 220 °C+22%
Specifications

Side by side

Ninja AF160 MAXNinja AF160 MAX≈ US$3907.4
Philco PHAOPhilco PHAO≈ US$2908.6
Power & capacity
Power1,750 W2,250 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.2 l15 l
Automatic programmes—16
Max. temperature180 °C220 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Bake, RoastCook, Air fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Interior light—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLCD
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingMetalStainless steel
ColoursBlackWhite, Silver
SeriesNinja Foodi—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare