- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Colorama 6025004 vs PHAF 2108
Menastyl Colorama 6025004 vs Philco PHAF 2108
What Colorama 6025004 does better (5) and where PHAF 2108 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Power & capacity4.2
8.6Versatility2.9
5.7Controls & convenience7.0
Why is Colorama 6025004 better than PHAF 2108?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.5 l vs 4 l+12%
- BakingYes · PHAF 2108: No
- Grill functionYes · PHAF 2108: No
- DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD
- Automatic programmes8 vs 7+14%
Why is PHAF 2108 better than Colorama 6025004?
- Viewing windowNo · Colorama 6025004: Yes
- Max. temperature200 °C vs 230 °C+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | — | 1,500 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 4.5 l | 4 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | 7 |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 230 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat | Cook |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | No |
| Grill function | Yes | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Viewing window | No | Yes |
| Interior light | — | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | LCD |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Glass |
| Colours | White | — |
