2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. KZM35 vs Classic

Kenwood KZM35 vs KLAMER Classic

What KZM35 does better (3) and where Classic wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood KZM35
Kenwood · 2024KZM35
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ US$180
vs
KLAMER Classic
KLAMER · 2025Classic
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$150
Higher score
3.0Power & capacity6.9
7.3Versatility6.5
9.0Controls & convenience7.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

KZM35Classic
180 × 300335375 × 230330
KZM35ClassicDifference
Height300 mm230 mm+70 mm
Width180 mm375 mm−195 mm
Depth335 mm330 mm+5 mm
Weight6.3 kg5.1 kg+1.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is KZM35 better than Classic?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · Classic: No
  2. Attachment hub (power outlet)Yes · Classic: No
  3. Pulse functionYes · Classic: No

Why is Classic better than KZM35?

  1. Power800 W vs 1,400 W+75%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.1 l vs 5.5 l+34%
  3. TimerNo · KZM35: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Kenwood KZM35Kenwood KZM35≈ US$1806.7
KLAMER ClassicKLAMER Classic≈ US$1508.2
Power & capacity
Power800 W1,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.1 l5.5 l
Speed settings66
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionYesYes
Attachment hub (power outlet)YesNo
Pulse functionYesNo
Soft startNoNo
Heating / cooking functionNo—
Bowl material—Stainless steel
Attachments includedWhisk, Food processor—
Number of accessories2—
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Whisk, Mix—
Controls & smart
Display—LED
TimerNoYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
HousingStainless steelStainless steel
Weight6.3 kg5.1 kg
Width180 mm375 mm
Height300 mm230 mm
Depth335 mm330 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare