2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. KZM35 vs Halo Core

Kenwood KZM35 vs Ooni Halo Core

What KZM35 does better (4) and where Halo Core wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood KZM35
Kenwood · 2024KZM35
6.7Score
4 advantages≈ US$180
Higher score
vs
Ooni Halo Core
Ooni · 2026Halo Core
4.0Score
2 advantages≈ US$630
3.0Power & capacity4.4
7.3Versatility2.2
9.0Controls & convenience5.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

KZM35Halo Core
180 × 300335180 × 300370
KZM35Halo CoreDifference
Height300 mm300 mm=
Width180 mm180 mm=
Depth335 mm370 mm−35 mm
Weight6.3 kg8.2 kg−1.9 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is KZM35 better than Halo Core?

  1. Power800 W vs 300 W2.7×
  2. Planetary mixing actionYes · Halo Core: No
  3. Number of accessories2 vs 12×
  4. Pulse functionYes · Halo Core: No

Why is Halo Core better than KZM35?

  1. Speed settings6 vs 203.3×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.1 l vs 4.5 l+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Kenwood KZM35Kenwood KZM35≈ US$1806.7
Ooni Halo CoreOoni Halo Core≈ US$6304.0
Power & capacity
Power800 W300 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.1 l4.5 l
Speed settings620
Top speed—300 rpm
Max. dough per batch—2.5 kg
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionYesNo
Attachment hub (power outlet)Yes—
Pulse functionYesNo
Soft startNoNo
Heating / cooking functionNoNo
Attachments includedWhisk, Food processor—
Number of accessories21
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Whisk, MixKnead
Controls & smart
Display—None (dials / switches)
TimerNoNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYes—
HousingStainless steel—
Cord length—1.1 m
Weight6.3 kg8.2 kg
Width180 mm180 mm
Height300 mm300 mm
Depth335 mm370 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare