3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 2196 vs NA320

Jocca 2196 vs Philips NA320

What 2196 does better (1) and where NA320 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Jocca 2196
Jocca · 20242196
3.9Score
1 advantage≈ US$95
vs
Philips NA320
Philips · 2024NA320
5.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$95
Higher score
3.4Power & capacity3.0
4.1Versatility8.9

Why is 2196 better than NA320?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 4.2 l+19%

Why is NA320 better than 2196?

  1. BakingNo · 2196: Yes
  2. Grill functionNo · 2196: Yes
  3. DehydratingNo · 2196: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Jocca 2196Jocca 2196≈ US$953.9
Philips NA320Philips NA320≈ US$955.2
Power & capacity
Power1,450 W—
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l4.2 l
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—No
Non-stick coating—No
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width—286 mm
Height—294 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare