2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 2193 vs R301002 VENTO

Jocca 2193 vs Remoska R301002 VENTO

What 2193 does better (5) and where R301002 VENTO wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Jocca 2193
Jocca · 20252193
8.5Score
5 advantages≈ US$130
Higher score
vs
Remoska R301002 VENTO
Remoska · 2025R301002 VENTO
5.3Score
0 advantages≈ US$130
8.1Power & capacity5.1
7.2Versatility4.1
7.2Controls & convenience4.9

Why is 2193 better than R301002 VENTO?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l vs 6.3 l+27%
  2. DehydratingYes · R301002 VENTO: No
  3. DisplayLED vs None (dials / switches)
  4. Non-stick coatingYes · R301002 VENTO: No
  5. Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%

Why is R301002 VENTO better than 2193?

R301002 VENTO has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Jocca 2193Jocca 2193≈ US$1308.5
Power & capacity
Power1,800 W—
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l6.3 l
Max. temperature200 °C190 °C
Min. temperature30 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, DehydrateCook, Air fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDNone (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
ColoursSilver—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare